OOTP BASEBALL 19 TOO MUCH INJURY TV

Otherwise, this team might as well have been sucked into the league and eliminated. It's a shit team that you are lucky to have found someone that probably will stick around at least long enough to fix the organization and move it in a positive direction. It creates a lack of fun and it will lead to more teams turning over and over and over. I think sitting around watching OOTP injure your players and crush their ratings just creates a less competitive atmosphere skewed toward the teams with the big budgets.

OOTP BASEBALL 19 TOO MUCH INJURY TV

If they haven't had a physical injury, they have certainly been whacked by ratings killer that is OOTP19 for virtually no reason other than it creates reality tv and drama. I am going to change every pitcher in my organization to sub 100 pitch counts except the ones I don't care about though, to see if it makes a difference.īoise = Least Injured? Really? Almost every single player on my team has taken a ratings hit. Even pitchers I have as starters have their scouting reports as RP sometimes. Every pitcher in my organization that is not in a starting rotation (including on the DL) is being listed as RP. As an aside, you mentioned somewhere that Mercado is listed as RP. If Markus is using PAP differently, he is wrong. Also, 90 PAP over the course of a season is next to nothing, and pitchers with that level of PAP have no statistically significant change in injury rate compared to guys with zero. 100-110 or so pitches is no more risky for injury than 100. To ignore it in your pitcher usage is tempting fate, and when a pitcher dies on you when you do that, it's not just bad luck. You can argue my position all you want, but we've been discussing injuries for a very, very long time. In my mind deciding to throw a pitcher more than 100 pitches an outing for a long time is called rolling the dice. And you're all probably tired of hearing me repeat myself. Really, all of this is less important to me than what this is doing to our league. Now I'm dithering about what the various settings in game should mean. So, anyway, it looks like we're going to find out that, surprise surprise, Markus and co have done good research into injury distribution and what we're getting is pretty close to a realistic model, relative to the particular injury setting we have. So that puts us at low most likely, and with that we are at a 70-75% injury rate compared to MLB. If you don't have that big of a difference, what's the point? Recte has said he's turned injuries down, and I believe he said before that that we were below 'high/mlb realistic' already. I'd think normal would be maybe 80% of mlb realism, low would be 60%, very low 40-50%, etc. (For those of you who don't know they are: very high>high(MLB realistic)>normal(OOTP classic)>low>very low>extremely low). If this is one of the lower settings I would be concerned. I would again like to make the point that we are about 70-75% of the MLB injury rate at some setting that is lower than the MLB rate. Looks like we're on track to be under at about the same rate we are for the other injuries I have the data on. Being almost done, well probably end up right around or just over 5000. We've lost or will lose 4,815 days due to shoulder injuries. Whether or not those were seven complete labral tears, I'm not sure. There were seven MLB shoulder injuries last year that required surgery. That's actually a pretty large difference. njury.html : 'Of the 36 major-league hurlers diagnosed with labrum tears in the last five years' (that's 7 per year. Doing the same as a building team doesn't really work as well. Injuries to young, developing players keep this from happening to the have nots more than they do to the haves, because the haves can trade young players for developed talent more easily. The only thing that can stop you is another team creating a bigger mass of talent. Once you have that, you can keep trading it as it gets older for younger players, keep developing, keep managing your assets and win indefinitely. I'd like to see last place teams benefit from their draft status, not be lumped into a crap shoot with everyone else.īeing a winning team is about acquiring a 'critical mass' of talent. I'd rather see division winners decided by talent than luck. I'm more concerned about the league environment, and the fun of it, and I don't like the trend. You mention this, but again, I'm not really making these points in relation to what I see on my big league team. I know Ted's argument is more holistic, but California has been 24th least injured team in the league. Among the things that makes this conversation amusing is that Boise is the BBA team that is factually the least injury bitten team in the BBA.

Ootp baseball 19 too much injury